Deep Thoughts by Ava
Oct. 2nd, 2009 11:01 amPlease raise your hands if you just weren’t impressed with Jared’s, or the version the writer’s gave him, of Lucifer? There was so much cliché and contradiction wrapped into such a short time it made my head hurt. How can Lucifer admit that the reason behind his fall was his ambivalence towards humanity and still walk around in a human body? Hello, my name is hypocrisy, and unless this little side note is explained (IE he needs the vessel to interact on this plan) then this is a plot hole you could drive a truck through.
I thought Castiel of the future was funny, but again I’m confused as to why Castiel wouldn’t have passed away with his power. Where is Jimmy? Does this future version of Castiel have split personalities or did Castiel completely fry poor Jimmy’s soul the second time he took over?
I do admit that I cheered when Lucifer stepped on Dean of the future’s neck to break it. The casual, he’s really not that important, end was perfectly anti-climatic and, in all honesty, Dean of the future deserved it. I am disappointed that we didn’t know what caused Sam to say yes and that interests me more then Dean’s tears and remorse.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-02 05:49 pm (UTC)The apocalypse is happening right now in the series. The battles are raging and the angels and humanity are currently on the losing end. There are some bright moments this season mostly surrounding Dean and Castiel's interaction and Chuck the prophet and they help balance out my confusion/irritation.
I'm just disappointed that Kripke and Co are doing the same 'why me' devil as most of Hollywood. I would have liked to see something different even if they made him sympathetic. I do like the actor playing him currently though. He has a definite guy next door vibe that makes him creepy.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-02 07:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-02 07:38 pm (UTC)And I kind of hate how Hollywood does the bible.
Maybe I'll catch up on the rerun-flipside...
no subject
Date: 2009-10-02 08:55 pm (UTC)Me too on the Hollywood and bible... the Passion of the Christ was decent, but a little squicky at times.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-02 09:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-03 12:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-03 01:30 am (UTC)Mel Gibson really wants authenticity on his next directing project, a movie about Jesus Christ called ''The Passion.'' - Taken from http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,353684,00.html
YMMV on whether factual = authentic.
Regardless, I thought it was bizarre that he kept saying in interviews that he wanted something realistic, yet he portrayed a character as seeing demons, never telling anyone that he saw the demons, and dying. Where did these demons come from, then?
no subject
Date: 2009-10-02 08:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-02 07:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-02 08:56 pm (UTC)